The performance is the main issue for us. For example, 10 years instead of five years." "HPE 3PAR StoreServ could have better integration into the cloud and converged infrastructure." "The speed of the hard disk could be better. They should provide support for a longer time. They will no longer support this solution. This is why we are removing them all from our organization this year." "The engagement of the tool's vendor is costly." "HPE 3PAR StoreServ is at its end of life and they are forcing us to purchase new hardware. There are more negative things at this moment than positive. "While the stability is pretty good, it could always be improved upon." "This solution is now at end-of-life." "Setting up 3PAR is somewhat complicated, and it took about a week." "The performance of the solution is not good anymore and the software is different from all the other types and is not compatible. Additionally, the solution could improve by having native integration with a cloud provider, such as VMware or Microsoft, this would reduce the need to use third-party solutions to complete the task." "It was not proactive communication." "Pure Storage support could be a little better." "The price should be lower." It could be available as an API to allow seamless integration. For example, if I want to use this storage for a backup from the cloud, I want to have integration with the cloud vendors, such as Microsoft, Oracles, or Amazon. FlashBlade is the powerhouse for File and Object storage, but if you don't need all that power, a lightweight file function would make FlashArrays more versatile." "I would like a feature to integrate with external or cloud solutions. The idea is that they would run a basic NFS or CIF share from the controllers. Additionally, there are some issues in the active cluster that could improve." "When we were doing some tests, we found that there was an I/O freeze when they were switching the controller." "It is a bit expensive." "We understand that they're thinking about it, but one of the things that would be nice is if they added some basic file-level capabilities to the platform. They need to resolve those issues, which I have already highlighted to the Pure team. There are certain features that are good and there are some features that I see some issues with at the technical level. "Pure Storage FlashArray could improve some aspects. Managing replication and data migration is also very easy." "This is the best all-flash storage array on the market." "Provides fast access and is user-friendly." "I like the speed, and I like the API and how programmable it is." "We find the ease of usability and setup valuable." "The code upgrades are very smooth." "The most valuable features in Pure Storage FlashArray are deduplication and active cluster." During maintenance, there is no shutdown procedure, so you can directly power off the Array and manage the shutdown process without any data loss, which is a unique feature. It's very user-friendly and it has high availability, so there is comparatively less downtime. The features in data protection, snapshotting, and replication between data centers and sites are superior to other solutions." "FlashArray has many valuable features. Additionally, the ease of use is good compared to other storage systems. "The most valuable feature of Pure Storage FlashArray is the all-flash storage performance, low latency, and efficiency of their de-duplication technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |